Monday , August 10 2020
Home / Ethereum / New Report: $2.5 Million Ethereum Fee is Neither Fat Fingers nor Money Laundering

New Report: $2.5 Million Ethereum Fee is Neither Fat Fingers nor Money Laundering

The two Ethereum transactions where senders paid millions of dollars in fees for transactions worth as little as $130 are widely believed to be blackmail. According to research from analytics company PeckShield, the hackers were reportedly blackmailing an unknown exchange by sending out transactions with exorbitant fees in order to circumvent the multi-signature security of the exchange and get away with the funds they stole through a phishing attack.

Over $5 Million Paid in Ethereum Transaction Fees

Earlier this week, separate transactions were sent on the Ethereum network that accrued over $5.6 million in fees for the mining pools that processed it. According to data from Etherscan, an unknown wallet sent out transactions worth just several hundred dollars, but paid tens of thousands of ETH in fees.

The news about the exorbitant Ethereum transaction fees spread fast through the crypto community, leading many to believe that it could be more than an honest mistake in which the sender switched the amount they wanted to send with the fee they wanted to pay. 

Many prominent voices in the industry noted that this could be a malicious act done by a hacker either to blackmail or cause another type of harm to a company. PeckShield, a blockchain analytics company based in China, believes that this is a classic case of blackmail, where the exorbitant Ethereum transaction fees were actually gas price ransomware attacks. 

What Most Likely Happened

According to PeckShield’s report, the “attacks” most likely began when an exchange’s hot storage fell victim to a phishing attack, in which hackers took over the company’s servers. However, as most exchanges have a private key that requires multi-signature verification, the hackers wouldn’t have been able to access its funds and transfer them to their own addresses. 

Instead, PeckShield researchers speculated, they realized that there was a group of addresses whitelisted by the exchange where funds could be sent without the need for multi-signature verification. By sending out minuscule transactions with exorbitant fees, the hackers were literally burning the exchange’s funds. According to ChainNews, this was most likely done in order to pressure the exchange to pay a ransom to the hackers. 

This, however, couldn’t last forever, as the address taken hostage by the hackers has a balance of 21,000 Ethereum. 

While certainly feasible, it’s important to note that this is still only a theory. PeckShield’s report didn’t identify the exchange they believe was affected, nor did they provide any other information about the hackers. 

Featured Image from Shutterstock

Source link

About admin

Check Also

Ethereum DeFi’s Poster Child Compound Surges 15%: What’s Next For COMP?

Bitcoin and Ethereum are pulling back, but Compound (COMP) is surging higher. The native governance …

11 comments

  1. Geam MERCEDES O 408 1992

    This article is truly a pleasant one it helps new internet people,

  2. Parbrize la domiciliu VOLVO FL 6 2000

    Hi my friend! I wish to say that this article is amazing,
    great written and include almost all vital infos. I’d like to
    look extra posts like this.

  3. Parbriz SAAB 900 I AC4 AM4 1987

    Greetings from Colorado! I’m bored to tears at work so I
    decided to browse your website on my iphone during lunch break.

    I enjoy the information you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
    I’m surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my phone ..
    thanks

  4. Luneta PIAGGIO M500 2013

    I do consider all of the concepts you’ve presented to your post.
    They’re very convincing and can definitely work.
    Still, the posts are too brief for beginners.

  5. Montaj Luneta SSANGYONG REXTON W 2018

    I think what you typed was actually very logical.
    But, what about this? suppose you wrote a catchier post title?
    I am not suggesting your information is not solid.

  6. Geam auto la domiciliu NISSAN MICRA C+C III K12 2006

    It’s an remarkable article in favor of all the internet people; they will get benefit from it
    I am sure. https://anunturi-parbrize.ro/index.php?page=5066

  7. Lunete auto la domiciliu MASERATI 4200 GT SPYDER Convertible 2016

    You actually make it seem really easy together with your presentation however I find this matter to be really something which I believe I would by no means understand.

    It kind of feels too complicated and extremely vast for me.

    I’m taking a look ahead to your subsequent
    put up, I’ll try to get the hang of it! https://anunturi-parbrize.ro/index.php?page=251

  8. Parbrize ALFA ROMEO 147 937 2002

    It’s awesome to pay a quick visit this web page and reading the views of all mates on the topic
    of this post, while I am also eager of getting experience. https://anunturi-parbrize.ro/index.php?page=4387

  9. Pret Luneta HYUNDAI H350 Box 2020

    This paragraph presents clear idea designed for the new people of blogging, that actually how to
    do blogging. https://anunturi-parbrize.ro/index.php?page=58

  10. Parbriz Bova Lexio 2010

    I like the helpful info you supply to your articles. I’ll bookmark your weblog and take a look at once more right here regularly.
    I am quite sure I will learn many new stuff right right here!
    Good luck for the next! https://anunturi-parbrize.ro/parbriz-bova-8.html

  11. Parbriz Lexus Es 2004

    We’re a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme
    in our community. Your web site provided us with valuable information to work on. You’ve
    done an impressive job and our whole community will be grateful to you. https://anunturi-parbrize.ro/parbriz-lexus-40.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *